ONLINE ISSUE No: 331

Friday 22 August 2008

Contact Us

 

EXPLORE

Write to the Editor

mtimes@intnet.mu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Founded in 1954 by Beekrumsingh Ramlallah

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
"As soon as fear approaches near, attack and destroy it"
-- Chanakya, Indian politician, strategist and writer

 

 

Let’s just do our duty sincerely… 

Dr R Neerunjun Gopee 

I am a believer in continuous learning, and recently I read something in an issue of the Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery that caught my attention. The article was about nursing approaches to improving patient care through the quality of life (QOL) concept, which encompasses several aspects: the functional status of patients, their emotional well-being, life satisfaction, anxiety and symptom intensity. The authors wrote that in Sub-Saharan Africa, being given the heavy workload and the pressure under which nurses work, ‘The focus is on what needs to be done rather than thinking about the results of what has been done.’ The implication is that, while performing a particular action, the nurse must always keep in mind whether it will impact favourably on the QOL dimensions. Such more ‘active engagement’ is presumed, then, to be able to achieve this desired result.

In general this should be the case, but experience tells us that there are ‘known unknowns’ and ‘unknown unknowns’ that can influence the course or results of actions. In other words, we do not have complete control over all the factors that come into play when we undertake to do something, and this dimension is usually referred to as chance, destiny, or fate. Still, this does not absolve us from sloppiness or a lackadaisical attitude towards the performance of our duties. But as long as we have done the right thing to the best of our ability and with a positive attitude, we can see that, in everything, when looked at in a broader perspective, our commitment should be to the performance of our action/s as part of our duty/-ies, and having done that, accept the eventual result calmly and gracefully. This does not preclude the fact that, should the result not be to our expectations, we should analyse why this has been so, and take the appropriate corrective measures in future.

The quotation from that journal struck me because it immediately reminded me of Verse 47 in Chapter 2 of the Bhagavad Gita: ‘You have the right to work, but never to the fruit of work. You should never engage in action for the sake of reward. Perform work in this world, Arjuna, as a man established within himself – without selfish attachments, and alike in success and defeat. For Yoga is perfect evenness of mind.’ Arjuna is one of the Pandava princes, whom Lord Krishna is teaching right there on the battlefield, where he is facing the army of Kauravas. Allegorically, the battlefield is that of our lives, our daily struggle to ward off what is bad and to adhere to what is good. This battle is fought from moment to moment in our minds, which has its likes and dislikes, and it is these latter which impel us to action.

Thus: I want to have a nice house, so I need the money to buy or build it, for which I have to work. Or, I do not like the colour of one of the rooms in the house, which will lead me to go and buy the colour of paint that I prefer. And so on – one can multiply the examples a thousand-fold, because we have so many desires and thus so many things to do.

This verse came to my mind because of the association of two events: the 24th World Ramayana Conference during the weekend of 8/9/10 August, and Krishna Janmashtami (celebration of the birthday of Bhagavan Shri Krishna) due tomorrow. The essential practical teaching of both the Ramayana and the Bhagavad Gita centres on the importance of abiding by dharma, in its aspects of the performance on one’s duty (kartavya) through engagement in action (karma) and the upholding of righteousness. To carry out an action, we need to know what is the end and what is the means.

And our performance must always be such that the means must justify the end – not the other way round, viz. that the end justifies the means. Because this leads us to the slippery road of unrighteousness: we may be tempted to use unethical means to achieve a given end. Because every action is inevitably followed by a reaction – in the short or the long term – the consequence of an unethical action can only be undeserved, even if there is short term gain e.g. stealing to buy a mobile phone, or cheating in the examination. The world abounds in instances of victims of unrighteousness, and they are too numerous to be mentioned here. Each one of us can pick his favourite one.

What the Ramayana stresses is that we have an obligation to do our kartavya (to ourselves first, to spouse and children, to parents/elders/ancestors, in our workplace, to the community and society at large, to all living things, etc.,), and what the Bhagavad Gita emphasises is that the actions to be done in the fulfillment of these duties must be ethical – that is, we must knowingly choose only the righteous means in doing them to achieve the end sought. And having done that, then it is best that we accept whatever result that comes as Prasad, as a grace from Bhagavan, and not get unduly excited when the result is as expected or better, or depressed when it is less or the opposite of that expected – these four outcomes: equal to and more than, or less than and opposite to that expected being the only possible ones in the natural order of things.

An example often cited is that of student taking his HSC exams. He has put in the necessary effort and time, sacrificed his leisure and so on. When the results come he gets three As expected, or he gets more: becomes a laureate. Other scenarios: when going to the exam hall he gets held up in traffic: when the results come he unfortunately has not got good grades or perhaps he fails. But it is clear that he was not responsible for the traffic hold-up, something entirely outside his control. Instead of blaming himself, his fate or finding fault with others, he must accept that these things can happen – and his close ones must support him at this crucial moment – and get over the negative episode, then brace himself up to continue again. For who knows that something better awaits him?

As happened to Dr Abdul Kalam. He was dejected after his the interview for his first job as technical officer in New Delhi, in the 1950s. In this state of mind, before he returned to his native Rameshwaran in Tamil Nadu, he went to Rishikesh and visited Pujya Swami Sivananda. The latter intuitively made out his situation, and told him not to worry because he was meant for bigger things.

Abdul Kalam became the leading rocket scientist of Bharat, and went on to become her Rashtrapati. His ‘Wings of Fire’ is a must read. Happy reading! 

RN Gopee

Copyright © 2005 Mauritius Times.

All rights reserved. Website designed and maintained by the  Staff of Mauritius Times.