“We are at a difficult turning point, and the coming elections will decide our future”

Encounter: Sarojini Seeneevassen

* ‘Ramgoolam and Berenger have nothing to lose and everything to gain by ending their careers with honour’

In this Encounter with Sarojini Seeneevassen, daughter of the late Renganaden Seeneevassen, a prominent figure in Mauritius’ political history, we delve into her reflections on her father’s legacy, her own political journey, and the current state of Mauritian politics. Sarojini Seeneevassen provides insights into her father’s profound influence on the Labour Party (LP) during the 1950s-60s, emphasizing his values of justice, honesty, and commitment to societal welfare. She discusses her early involvement with the MMM and her eventual return to the Labour Party, drawing parallels between her aspirations and her father’s vision for Mauritius.

From addressing contemporary challenges in Mauritian society to offering advice for aspiring women in politics, Sarojini Seeneevassen shares her perspectives shaped by a diverse career that spans marine biology studies in Germany to serving as Mauritius’ ambassador to Germany and Austria. She also offers a candid reflection on the path forward for Mauritius, emphasizing the importance of leadership qualities, good governance, and the resilience of Mauritian society in facing current and future challenges.

* The Global Rainbow Foundation recently honoured your father, Renganaden Seeneevassen, for his pivotal role in the Labour Party (LP) during the 1950s-60s on a recent TV program. Could you share more about your father’s contributions to the LP and his influence on Mauritian politics at that time?

To appreciate anyone’s achievements, one has to understand the historical context in which he lived. Since I was six years old in June 1958 when my father passed away, some historians are perhaps better placed to describe his political career in detail. Yet, I can confidently assert that his kindness, sense of justice, and honesty formed the cornerstone of his contribution to society throughout his brief life.

I quote his words of thanks in 1947 at the Legislative Council for his nomination:

“My ardent desire is to work for the welfare of my countrymen and, in particular, for the multitude of men and women who have not full political rights in the country and who in their moments of distress look up to us for comfort. I am alive to the great difficulties that are ahead of us… but I shall spare no effort to bring in my modest contribution in the pursuit of the good government of the country and the happiness of the people.”

He meant every word, so much that he died as Minister of Education penniless — something unheard of in this century.

Speaking about the Labour Party’s ideology, he said:

“…We do not think we should assess a man with regard to his origin. We think that whatever may be the origin of men here, this country is their birthright and they are all citizens of this country…we do not want it for one particular community…We say we want constitutional progress so that the less favoured people in this country, the working people in this country, may have political expression…Those are the reasons for which we want to change the Constitution. That is why we want universal suffrage. That is why we want responsible government.”

Once more, he meant every word. Leveraging his skills as a lawyer, he laid the foundation for our Constitution.

Napal wrote the following on Friday 20th June 1958, in the Mauritius Times, to describe Seeneevassen’s impact on our Constitution:

“There is a strangely prophetic ring in his concluding words before the Consultative Committee,” and he quotes Seeneevassen: “There will be a social evolution in the world and there will be big waves of it. Sir, I think these waves will reach Mauritius be it in the shape of ripples and these people will progress as fast politically that if now we have in the country any Constitution that would not embrace them, we shall very quickly find that our Constitution has become antiquated, and we may have trouble and great dissatisfaction.”

Napal goes on to write:

“He seemed to look quite into the seeds of time. The Seeneevassen of 1945 was, so to say, a prophet pointing to the not-too-distant future.”

His vision of a Mauritian society was far-reaching. While grounded in his own culture as a Tamil, he valued the harmony between cultures in Mauritius as a necessity for a sound society. Historian Mohindranath Varma:

“If Renganaden Seeneevassen had lived longer, he would have been a true bulwark against communalism. If he had been there, communalism would not have been so rampant, eventually becoming the cancer of Mauritianism.”

* How has your father’s legacy influenced your views and involvement in politics?

I was fortunate to grow up among people who were close to him and imbued with his values. He was a kind and gentle person, always initiating discussions before attributing blame for any misdeed, even with me as a child.

He was a gentleman, and I recall that many gentlemen populated the political arena during his time. Just compare the Vaghjee of his generation to today’s Phokeer as a speaker in parliament!

* Your initial involvement in politics was with the MMM, which may have initially surprised the LP leadership. However, you eventually returned ‘home,’ so to speak. Looking back, do you consider these experiences necessary and perhaps inevitable?

Yes, these experiences were necessary, and I cherish them. It was a learning process for me. I identified my aspirations for progress in my country with the vision of the MMM. Later, I thought I could contribute to the good functioning of the Labour Party.

My aspirations reflect my father’s values. They remain the same today, but the methods to achieve them obviously change with circumstances, which require constant analysis. I now feel comfortable having two leaders whom I know can navigate our path forward.

* In an appeal published in l’express last month, you urged Navin Ramgoolam and Paul Berenger to take action to heal ‘societal divisions.’ ‘Success in the (next) elections isn’t just about winning…,’ you wrote, emphasizing that ‘it’s (their) last chance.’ Mauritian society has proven to be resilient and adaptive over the years. Do you believe it is currently at risk of falling apart?

We will stand again because, as you say, Mauritian society has proven resilient and adaptive over the years. Yes, we are at a difficult turning point, and the coming elections will decide our future. There has been serious degradation in corruption, drug abuse, violence, and moral values in general. There are reasons behind this that need to be addressed.

* The electorate may not share the same view, and a majority may choose to maintain the status quo unless they are won over by the Opposition’s arguments and convinced of the viability of the Ramgoolam-Berenger alliance. You seem to believe that’s a winning proposition, don’t you?

Yes, I believe Navin Ramgoolam and Paul Berenger will leverage their experience in governance during their final mandate. They have nothing to lose and everything to gain by ending their careers with honour. I am encouraged to see Rezistans ek Alternativ joining this struggle, and I am convinced they could play an important role in defining our path for the future.

Of course, the electorate will decide, and the outcome will depend on how well-informed citizens are. It is not always easy for the layman to judge between qualified information and cheap propaganda. People must vote fully aware of the present situation. Neutralizing fake news and providing correct information is the duty of every citizen, drawing on their different fields of expertise.

* However, you may be correct regarding the ‘last chance’ for Opposition leaders, and we have yet to see either of them ensure the continuing viability of their respective parties in the years ahead. This stands in contrast to the Singaporean model we have recently observed with the leadership transition from former PM Lee Hsien Loong to his deputy, Lawrence Wong. What are your thoughts on this?

The Singaporeans have proved that it is possible, and their model is an inspiration. It exemplifies good governance from which we can learn. While we cannot simply replicate their model, we can adapt successful strategies to our current situation and thus pave our own path towards a well-managed public and private sector, alongside other institutions.

A political party aspiring to govern a nation must establish order within its own ranks. We will not achieve Singaporean levels of law and order in the coming months, nor in any subsequent government or political party. However, the will must be there to lay the groundwork, and that is the courageous path I believe Navin Ramgoolam and Paul Berenger can and will take. Their combined political and personal wisdom represents our hope for tomorrow.

* As the daughter of Renganaden Seeneevassen, we assume you have an emotional attachment to the Labour Party. Could you share your thoughts on the current state of the Party and its effectiveness in addressing contemporary challenges?

My heart goes out to the members and supporters of the Labour Party who have dedicated years to advocating for the rights of all citizens. I remember, as a child, the unwavering dedication of the Labour Party’s political agents. I particularly remember Guy Narainsamy, whom my father mentored, as one of the true and loyal Labourites. I believe they deserve not only to improve in managing their country but also in managing their party. This is what is expected from our leaders at this juncture in our history. This is the essence of this election.

The effectiveness in addressing contemporary challenges is relative. While the Labour Party may not match Singapore’s level of effectiveness, it undoubtedly possesses a qualified pool of members who can and will rise to the challenge.

* Like in most parties worldwide, everything revolves around the leader, and so it is with the LP and the MMM. What qualities do you consider crucial for effective leadership in modern-day Mauritius, and who do you identify as emerging leaders within the Party?

I consider general qualities such as honesty, a solid set of values, and empathy crucial, but none of these will work without knowledge of our political history, societal evolution, and keeping abreast of global developments.

A leader must delegate and must, therefore, be adept at assessing those around them. This enables better judgment in identifying emerging leaders, a task I am not in a position to undertake. It falls within the purview of current leaders who have an overview of their party members.

* What do you see as the major challenges facing Mauritius in terms of governance and socio-economic development today?

One of my greatest concerns is the extent of drug abuse and trafficking and its impact on society. The poor are the most affected, but this scourge has spread and can now affect any family. Criminality has become intertwined with drug use, and containing this problem is a significant challenge.

There is a connection between many of our issues, as drugs fuel crime, corruption, violence, financial crimes, and undermine moral values. Ultimately, achieving good governance is the key to addressing our socio-economic development and well-being.

* What advice would you give to young Mauritian women aspiring to enter politics, considering your own journey and experiences?

It’s crucial to thoroughly understand the current situation and find out why it is the way it is. In short, grasp the history of your country. Support and respect from your family are especially vital for Mauritian women. Choose your mentors and friends wisely. Regardless of gender, it’s essential to remember that there are things we don’t know, and sometimes, we’re not even aware of what we don’t know. This is where our ego, hidden somewhere, can lead us into trouble. In general, it’s wise to look before you leap.

* Looking ahead, what are your hopes and expectations for the Labour Party and the future direction of Mauritian politics?

I’ve already expressed my optimism about further developments in the Labour Party. This is a process, and I am confident that Navin Ramgoolam will initiate it. With all that he has experienced and endured; he is well-positioned to initiate the necessary improvements.

* On a personal level, you’ve had a diverse journey — from studying marine biology in Germany to becoming Mauritius’ ambassador to Germany and Austria. How have your experiences shaped your perspective on diplomacy and international relations?

Every step in life provides valuable experience. Life can be daunting, but each hurdle crossed brings immense satisfaction.

As for diplomacy and international relations, I believe more can be accomplished. But it always boils down to proper management of our ministries and institutions. Embassies and similar entities cannot function in isolation; they require government support and clear direction from the government. This underscores the need for a well-functioning government.

* You’ve faced tough personal circumstances, including legal battles to regain custody of your son. How have these experiences influenced your approach to overcoming obstacles in both your personal and professional life?

I’ve learned to maintain composure when seeking solutions. It’s important to try and understand even one’s worst adversary. Often, they may not truly be an adversary. While it easy and straightforward, but we are constantly learning how to approach hurdles and solve problems. I am still learning and acknowledge that my solutions may differ from others’. There are multiple perspectives on any issue, and it’s beneficial to consider them all before drawing conclusions.

---

Mauritius Times ePaper Friday 5 July 2024

Tags:1947 Legislative Council, Constitution, Corruption, diplomacy, Drug Abuse, Drug Trafficking, Global Rainbow Foundation, Good Governance, governance, International Relations, Labour Party, Lawyer, Leadership Qualities, Mauritius Times, MMM, Moral Values, Ramgoolam-Berenger alliance, Renganaden Seeneevassen, Responsible Government, Sarojini Seeneevassen, Singaporean Model, Social Evolution, Societal Divisions, Socio-Economic Development, Universal Suffrage, Violence